tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35139337.post1403132456094881759..comments2022-04-01T15:19:09.110-06:00Comments on The Elusive Guanaco: Debunking Design - A Conclusion to HumeUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35139337.post-69831174754892418922011-07-26T00:06:46.984-06:002011-07-26T00:06:46.984-06:00About what?About what?Matthewhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/18029046130272045007noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35139337.post-26372077629787573352011-07-19T13:16:53.984-06:002011-07-19T13:16:53.984-06:00What do you mean?What do you mean?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35139337.post-20653382775631243242011-04-12T11:44:08.270-06:002011-04-12T11:44:08.270-06:00N = 1 is a poor sample size to work with but it is...N = 1 is a poor sample size to work with but it is all we have. No two experiences are exactly the same so all causal inferences are statistical with errors. The mind is a probability machine which models reality well enough for survival (some of the time). Hume's ideas are still the basis for these ideas. Great book.jmchebib@ucalgary.cahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01969339049004076749noreply@blogger.com